| AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION
JOURNAL |
58:752-753(1997) |
762 |
| Effect
of Personal Hygiene on
Blood Lead Levels of Workers at
a Lead Processing Facility |
AUTHORS:
Daniel P. Askin
Mark Volkmann
The relationship between personal hygiene and blood
lead levels was tested at a lead processing facility. During the
workers' semiannual respirator fit test, when they were confident
their hands were clean, the amount of lead on their right hands
was measured. Samples were obtained by cleaning one entire hand
with a wiping towel treated with a proprietary mixture of alcohol,
surfactants, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.Wipe Samples were
analyzed for total lead and then compared with the worker's blood
lead level. Each worker's personal habits at rest were also observed.
Workers with more than I year's experience had a significantly positive
correlation between lead on the hand tested and their blood level.
The study strongly suggests that lead on the skin ultimately enters
the bloodstream. The route of entry was not investigated. Personal
habits of the workers with high blood lead levels were observed
to include actions that would quickly contaminate their hands shortly
after washing.
Keywords: blood lead, dermal exposure, personal
hygiene, skin wipe sample
An investigation of the relationship between
personal hygiene and blood lead levels was conducted at a lead processing
facility. During semiannual respirator fit-testing, the amount of
lead on each worker's right hand was measured with a wipe sample.
Previous testing by the author on the effectiveness of the skin
cleansers used at this facility established variability of the available
soaps to remove lead oxide.
Samples were obtained by wiping each worker's
right hand with a moist towelette that had been treated with a proprietary
mixture of alcohol, cleaner, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
(EDTA; ESCA Tech, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.). The sample technician
wore a clean pair of disposable plastic gloves (Lab Safety Supply,
Janesville, Wis., Part 7A-1358 DP) for each test to avoid any contamination
from the technician's hands. Both sides of the right hand up to
the wrist, both sides of each finger, and the top of each fingernail
were wiped with a single towelette, using a back-and-forth motion.
No attempt was made to clean under the fingernails. The towelette
was folded and placed in a 120-mL, sterile specimen container, sealed,
and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. An unused towelette
(control blank) was treated in the same manner as the test samples.
Employee t was used as an additional control. This individual was
an office worker who did not work in the plant. This person is not
included in the data averages. During the fit-test, each worker's
personal habits were observed and noted for later comparison with
blood lead levels and hand lead levels.
After the results were analyzed, the amount
of lead on each worker's right hand was compared with his or her
blood lead level. These results are shown in Table I. Subjectively,
it was observed that low blood lead workers had cleaner work clothes
and shoes than high blood lead workers. With the one exception noted,
all of the other workers said they had washed their hands after
leaving the factory and before coming for their fit-test. Individuals
with low and high blood leads were observed to differ in their personal
habits when they were relaxed. For the quantitative fit test, they
sat in a chair while they did the required exercises.
Persons with high blood leads shared one or more of
the following habits while sitting relaxed in the chair.
| (1) |
They rested their hands in their laps or on
their legs, where their hands could Pick up lead from their
dirty coveralls. |
| (2) |
They put their hands in their pockets and
played with change or keys. |
| (3) |
One or more of their fingernails had been
bitten off. |
| (4) |
They had visible dirt under their fingernails. |
Individuals with low blood lead levels shared the
Following habits while sitting relaxed in a chair.
| (1) |
They rested their forearms or elbows on their
legs, with their hands hanging clear of their coveralls. |
| (2) |
None were observed putting their hands in
their pockets. |
| (3) |
None of their fingernails had been bitten
off. |
| (4) |
Little or no dirt was visible under any of
their fingernails. |
Back to top
|
Employee
|
Blood Lead
m /dL |
Micrograms
Pb/Hand |
Blood Lead
Range |
Average
Pb/Hand |
|
Blank
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
t
|
6
|
75
|
|
|
|
d
|
20
|
312
|
|
|
|
i
|
22
|
230
|
|
|
|
m
|
24
|
97
|
20-25
|
213
|
|
h
|
26
|
94
|
|
|
|
r
|
29
|
229
|
|
|
|
y
|
29
|
388
|
26-29
|
237
|
|
l
|
30
|
511
|
|
|
|
p
|
32
|
656
|
|
|
|
b
|
33
|
365
|
|
|
|
s
|
34
|
431
|
|
|
|
x
|
34
|
534
|
30-34
|
499
|
|
n
|
35
|
470
|
|
|
|
u
|
35
|
1650
|
|
|
|
z
|
36
|
542
|
|
|
|
o
|
36
|
608
|
|
|
|
e
|
37
|
535
|
|
|
|
q
|
37
|
1275
|
|
|
|
k
|
38
|
1146
|
|
|
|
g
|
38
|
656
|
|
|
|
c
|
39
|
1018
|
35-39
|
878
|
|
f
|
42
|
4410
|
|
|
|
w
|
42
|
2166
|
|
|
|
a
|
45
|
2440
|
40-45
|
3005
|
Note: Average blood lead
level = 31 mg/dL
Every worker had been property trained on respirators
and received a quantitative respirator fit-test twice a year. Workers
also received personal hygiene training at the same time. The facility
met all relevant aspects of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
lead standard. All workers wore leather-palm gloves with gauntlet
cuffs while working. All but two of the workers tested had worked
in the facility for 1 or more years-Iong, enough for their blood
lead levels to stabilize. Workers reported for their fit-test after
they had started a shift and within 15 minutes of the last time
they had reportedly washed their hands, with one exception. Workers
spent this 15 minutes in the break areas and did not enter the plant.
Three individuals are not included in the data presented here. Two
persons with high lead levels on their hands and low blood leads
were new to the plant, having worked there 2 months or less. This
was too soon for their blood leads to stabilize. The third person
who was not included had a blood lead of 22 and a hand lead of 3776
mg/hand. He stated that before the test he had not stopped to wash his
hands. He was in a hurry to get back to his job and was tested without
having washed his hands. Since the objective was to test people
as then, were, he was not instructed to go and wash. Under normal
circumstances, he would have been directed to wash prior to the
respirator fit-test.
Questions for Further Testing
| (1) |
Did all workers really wash their hands as
they said they did? |
| (2) |
The available hand soaps differ in their ability
to remove lead. Did an employee's soap selection affect the
lead level on the hand and consequently the blood lead level?
|
| (3) |
Do the workers know how to wash their hands?
This aspect of training had not yet been addressed. |
| (4) |
Where did the lead come from? The high lead
workers frequently touched their clothes or rested their hands
in their laps or pockets. Do the coveralls really have that
much lead on them? |
| (5) |
Does the amount of lead on the work clothes
differ between workers with high and low lead levels? How
does the lead level on their coveralls compare with their
blood lead levels? |
Back to top
There was a significant association
between the lead levels in blood and on the hand surface of these
workers. The positive correlation coefficient was 0.61 and has a
highly significant association (p < 0.002). Workers with higher
levels of surface lead on their hands had higher blood lead levels.
Lead on the surface of the hands could enter the body in three ways.
Since the workers with high hand surface lead levels demonstrated
poorcr personal hygiene practices, it is possible the higher blood
lead levels resulted partially if not entirely from ingestion, by
hand-to-mouth transfers. If the skin had cracks or cuts, it is possible
that some lead entered the bloodstream directly, since the integrity
of the skin as a barrier isolating the blood from the environment
had been compromised. Long-term exposure to lead on the skin may
result in a larger contribution to blood lead levels than currently
believed via percutaneous absorption of the inorganic lead through
the skin, or via sweat glands and hair follicles. Lead on hands
appears to ultimately result in higher blood lead levels. Investigation
of the routes lead takes into the bloodstream is needed. Workers
who keep their hands continuously clean should be able to maintain
lower blood lead levels.
Viverette, L., H.W. Mielke, M. Brisco, A. Dixon,
et al.: Environmental health in minority and other underserved
populations: benign methods for identifying lead hazards at day
care centers of New Orleans. Environ. Geocbem. Health 18-.41-45
(1996).
Mielke, H.W., L. Viverette, M. Brisco, L. Scott,
et al.: Surface dust on hands as a method for assessing and
preventing childhood lead exposure. In Hazardous Waste: Impacts
on Humans and Ecological Health, B.J. Johnson, C. Xintaras, and
J.S. Andrews Jr. (eds.). Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry, 1996.
Stauber, J.L., T.M. Florence, B.L. Gulson, and
L.S. Dale: Percutaneous absorption of inorganic lead compounds.
Sci. Total Environ. 145(1-2): 55-70 (1994).
Back to top
| 752 AIHA JOURNAL
(58) October 1997 |
Copyright 1997,
American Industrial Hygiene Association |
|